Author Archives: administrator

Internship on British South Asian History: Hannah Clark

Posted on by
Reply

In this blog post, we hear from Hannah Clark, who has just finished the second year of her history degree at the University of Bristol and completed this internship on British South Asian History over the summer.

Over the last six weeks, I contributed to the development of a public digital resource titled ‘South Asian Britain: Connections and Networks’ – you can find out more about this here. I worked alongside Professor Sumita Mukherjee, one of the University of Bristol’s historians that have led the project ‘Remaking Britain: South Asian Connections and Networks, 1830s to the present.’ To mark South Asian Heritage month (18 July – 17 August), the website was launched this July. This resource caters both to the wider public and to individuals conducting academic research. It consists predominantly of entries and oral histories on people, organisations and events related to the interconnected experiences of South Asians in Britain. This opportunity was facilitated by the Widening Participation Research Summer Internship Programme.

During my internship, I engaged with a range of research methods and gained experience completing different types of tasks that a project like this requires. My first week was spent familiarising myself with the topic, and in my second week I helped with website editing, either captioning photographs or fixing inaccurate map pins on certain entries. In my third week, I got the opportunity to conduct archival research for the first time, spending three days in the Arts and Social Science’s Special Collections. I specifically looked at records on M.G.K. Menon, a physicist who received his PhD from the University of Bristol, and on the first British South Asian Members of Parliament. I found this process fascinating, and I was able to apply my research on Menon when I later wrote his entry for the website.

The second half of my internship was spent writing entries on different people. I particularly enjoyed this task, and it has further improved the way I process resources, preparing me more to take on a dissertation this academic year. What I appreciated most was the process of going from reading an individual’s name for the first time, to piecing together my best attempt at an overview of their life; it was extremely interesting, and at times quite moving. For example, though I only found limited information on her, I wrote about the UK’s first female Sikh and South Asian police officer, PC Karpal Kaur Sandhu. Her story is tragic, as she was murdered at 30 by her husband, who deemed her profession unsuitable for a woman. Her story is also groundbreaking and inspiring, and she left a legacy that has motivated subsequent generations of female police officers. Being able to shed light on individuals that have broken down barriers in society, like PC Sandhu, is one of the many reasons that public history projects like Remaking Britain are so beautiful and so important.

This internship gave me the opportunity to see what goes on behind the scenes of a research project. One can easily take a website like this for granted, without considering the number of contributors and the amount of effort it requires to complete. This experience has helped me to develop my own research abilities and has taught me so much about this topic and its significance. I am so grateful to have been supervised by Professor Mukherjee, with whom I had weekly meetings and continuous support with every aspect of my internship. I wholeheartedly urge anyone intrigued by academic research to apply to this programme in the future!

‘Histories of the Present’: Writing for Policy Makers

Posted on by
Reply

In this blog post, Bristol lecturer Amy Edwards reflects on her new project exploring women and self-employment and on working with policy makers.

Over the past 18 months I have been running an AHRC-funded project called ‘The Secret of My Success’: Women and Self-Employment in Britain (1970-2000) which focuses on the recent history of women’s self-employment. The aim of the project is to understand the motivations and lived experiences of women who worked for themselves in the closing decades of the twentieth century.

A lot of the work I’ve done for this project has involved familiar historical work. I travelled to archives to consult the records of companies like Avon Cosmetics, who hired thousands of women to work as independent sales representatives. I spent hours sifting through digitized newspapers, looking for reports featuring women entrepreneurs. I also conducted oral histories with women who worked for themselves during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, listening to stories about lives shaped by family obligation, friendship, house moves, illnesses, career breaks, and economic upheaval.

Something less familiar, has been the experience of translating my historical findings for non-academic audiences – or more specifically, for policymakers. A central aim of the project is to explore the opportunities, barriers, and conditions that affected self-employed women in the past, but to also think about what this can tell us about women’s working lives in the present. As a contemporary historian, I’m inherently interested in solving the puzzle of how we got to where we are today.

To this end, I have recently been working with PolicyBristol, a team based at the university who support academics in using their research to shape policy at local, national, and international levels. With their help, I have been turning my research into a series of Parliamentary Select Committee evidence submissions. Select Committees form part of the daily work of parliamentarians: they launch inquiries into current issues, and gather evidence from members of the public, academics, practitioners, businesses, think tanks, and activists. Committees then report their findings to parliament, who have 60 days to respond. In other words, submitting research to a relevant inquiry is a great way to inform policy development in key areas such as the economy, education, environment, and culture.

For this project, I identified two active inquiries that were relevant to the research I had been conducting: one for the House of Commons Women and Equalities Select Committee, and one for the House of Lords Home-Based Working Select Committee. I quickly learnt the importance of directly responding to the specific questions that each Committee set out as part of its call for evidence. Submissions also need to be concise, with key findings highlighted at the top: working parliamentarians don’t have hours of free time to read an entire thesis on a topic. They do, however, want specific recommendations – that is, evidence-based suggestions for how a particular issue might be addressed. This requires a knowledge not only of your own research area, but also of the current policy-landscape. It’s important to ask yourself what is the need/ problem that parliament is trying to address? What policies already exist in this area? Have other stakeholders – advocacy groups, think tanks, charities etc. – already had their say, and if so, what were their recommendations?  And ultimately, for a historian, the question is: what can a historical perspective add here? What does placing this issue into a longer context do to change our understanding of it (and how it might be tackled today)?

This was a really different way of writing, or even thinking about, a historical research project. Others have written much more insightfully than I can here, about the benefits and challenges of using historical knowledge to solve present-day problems (something that John Tosh labelled  Applied History). Crossing the bridge between academia and policy is tricky work. But it is also rewarding. I found translating my ideas about the relationship between emotions, social relations, time, space, and work into practical, applicable policy recommendations incredibly useful. It pushed me towards really thinking about historical subjects as people living through the historical phenomena I usually try to analyse. I had to consider what might have changed their lives had politicians at the time paid more mind to their experiences.

Most of all it reminded me of one of my favourite quotes from researcher and translator Graham Burchell, when he discussed his ‘experience of not being a citizen of the community or republic of thought and action in which one nevertheless is unavoidably implicated or involved’ – that is, of feeling out of place in society. In such a situation, Burchell reminds us how important it is to reveal ‘the (often quite recent) inventedness of our world’.[1] I think that history is a great tool for doing just that: it shows us that how we organise society, politics, and the economy is neither inevitable nor enduring. As such, using our research to remind those in power that we need more than sheer presentism to tackle the plurality of issues we face today, is work worth doing.

Dr Amy Edwards is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Bristol and historian of twentieth and twenty-first century Britain. Her research focuses on cultures of capitalism, investment, and enterprise. Her first book, Are We Rich Yet? (UCP, 2022) explains how financial markets became so central to British society, not only economically and politically, but socially and culturally, too. She is now leading an AHRC-funded project titled ‘The Secret of My Success: Women and self-employment in Britain, c.1970-2000’.

Find Amy on:

Bluesky: @somsproject.bsky.social

LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/somsdramyedwards

Instagram: somsproject

[1] Graham Burchell, ‘Liberal Government and Techniques of the Self’ in, Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose (eds.), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government (London: UCL Press, 1996), 19-36, 30.

Return of the Mach: Heir to Concorde to the Skies – A Transport Revolution?

Posted on by
Reply

Almost twenty-two years after Concorde completed its final commercial flight to Bristol in 2003, a US-made prototype jet, Boom Supersonic’s XB-1, has successfully broken the sound barrier. As a historian of industry, politics and technology in Britain and the wider world, Dr Keith Mc Loughlin considers the significance of the achievement, the challenges facing supersonic transport and the historical lessons to be learnt if it is to succeed…

To read more from Keith on Concorde, check out the original Arts Matter blog post!

PhDone! Dr Qiqing Tan

Posted on by
Reply

Dr Qiqing Tan is a PhD graduate from the History Department at the University of Bristol, where she joined in 2020 after completing her master’s degree at Renmin University in China. Under the supervision of Professors Brendan Smith and Benjamin Pohl, she successfully defended her doctoral thesis on Irish revenue in January 2025.

Hi Qiqing. First of all, congratulations on your successful viva! Can you tell us a bit about what your doctoral research was about?

Thanks! My research investigates the state of Irish revenue and the operation of the Irish exchequer during the reign of Edward II (1307-1327). By analysing various sources of revenue through both geographical and chronological perspectives, it contends that, despite various pressures, the Irish exchequer effectively navigated the English lordship in Ireland through some of the most severe crises in medieval Irish history. Moreover, this study employs the operations of this fiscal system as a prism through which to explore how individuals and communities in Ireland adapted to this rapidly deteriorating conditions. Officials, ministers, clerks, citizens, farmers, and foreigners alike demonstrated resilience and flexibility in adversity, seeking to maintain and advance their positions amid a time of crisis.

How did you become interested in Irish fiscal history?

My interest in this field began during my master’s degree, where I focused on the English exchequer in the twelfth century. This research provided a solid foundation for understanding the development of fiscal systems in England. As I delved deeper into the subject, I became increasingly fascinated by how these institutions expanded and evolved in the late Middle Ages, particularly in Ireland, which was under English control at the time. The Irish exchequer, in particular, caught my attention due to the volume of surviving records, which offered a valuable, though manageable, source for studying a period of around twenty years. Furthermore, the fourteenth century in Ireland was an especially intriguing era, marked by political instability, power struggles, and the contestation of different identities. This complexity made Ireland an ideal setting for exploring the interplay between fiscal systems, society, and politics.

What did you enjoy most about your project?

One of the most enjoyable aspects of my research was the quiet, contemplative time I spent with the records. There’s something meditative about immersing yourself in historical documents and piecing together the past from seemingly fragmented data. I was constantly struck by the way small details in the financial records could tell you so much about the social and political fabric of the time. It was the process of solving these puzzles that I found particularly satisfying—there’s a deep joy in uncovering hidden patterns or discovering something previously overlooked in the archives. The interdisciplinary nature of my research also kept me engaged, as I was able to draw from history, economics, and political science to enrich my understanding.

Any top tips for lunch spots near your archives / libraries / museum collections / the Bristol University campus?

Absolutely! Near the University of Bristol, I highly recommend Chris and Jo’s Kitchen for lunch. It’s a lovely spot that serves wholesome, delicious food. If you’re ever in Dublin near the National Archives of Ireland, I always enjoyed stopping by Brew Lab Specialty Coffee. It’s a fantastic coffee shop where I’d grab a coffee to start my day or take a quick lunch break. The atmosphere there really helped energise me for the long hours spent in the archives.

Heading of one Irish receipt roll (TNA, E 101/237/3, m.8)

Let’s talk about the viva itself. What would you advise someone who is preparing for their own viva?

Preparing for the viva can be nerve-wracking, but the key is to be well-prepared and to stay calm. Even though you wrote the thesis, it’s crucial to familiarise yourself thoroughly with every section, as you may be asked to explain concepts in ways that require more depth than the written document provides. A good practice is to make a list of possible questions that could arise. The ‘Viva Survivors’ website is a great resource for this. In addition, try to rehearse your answers and don’t rely too heavily on notes during the viva itself. The more you practise, the more confident you’ll feel in presenting your ideas clearly and coherently. Lastly, remember that the viva is as much a conversation as it is an examination—don’t be afraid to engage with your examiners thoughtfully.

What’s next for you? Where can we find your research and/or writing now?

 At the moment, I am applying for postdoctoral fellowships, which will allow me to continue my research into medieval fiscal history. I’m also in the process of developing a book proposal based on my doctoral thesis, with the goal of expanding the research and making it more accessible to a broader audience, particularly those interested in the history of English colonial rule in Ireland. My work is also featured in the forthcoming volume Scotland and England, c.1300 to 1603: War, Diplomacy, and Power, edited by Andy King, Gordon McKelvie, and Jenny McHugh, where I have contributed an article titled ‘The Repercussions of the Scottish War: A Financial Approach to the Bruce Invasion of Ireland, 1315-1318’ (Brepols, forthcoming).

Shaun Wallace on In Pursuit of Freedom

Posted on by
1

In this blog post, Bristol lecturer Shaun Wallace reflects on his forthcoming book In Pursuit of Freedom: Fugitive Slaves and Advertised Escape in the Early Republic.

Explaining the origins and motivations behind my first manuscript I find myself gravitating toward the same inspiration I accredit to my decision to study and teach American slavery—the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave (1845). As a second year student at the University of Stirling in 2008, my introduction to racial slavery was through Douglass’s eloquent and powerful antebellum autobiography. I was drawn to its themes of agency and resistance and to the life of Douglass, the self-taught author who learned to read and write and used his literateness to challenge, and eventually escape, the system that enslaved him. I analysed literateness within narrative accounts of enslavement written by formerly enslaved people for my undergraduate dissertation, explored the relationship between literacy and escape for my MRes thesis, and resistance as captured in fugitive slave advertisements for my PhD project.

Yet, for every question answered, another seemed to appear. How did bondpersons pursuit of literacy fuse with their understanding of freedom? What other motivations led enslaved persons to escape? Douglass was Maryland’s most famous fugitive but who were the others—The women, men, and children who never left written testimonies but were advertised as escapees by enslavers? How did demographic, geographical, and temporal factors shape fugitivity patterns—Did bondpersons who escaped from the Chesapeake region in the upper South share the same profile as escapees from slavery in the deeper South?I designed the Fugitive Slave Database (FSdb) to address these questions. One of the largest digital archives of American fugitive slave advertisements from the turn of the nineteenth century, I built it to preserve fugitivity notices in their complete and original form, bring them into a corpus of historical evidence, and create datasets for analysis. A total of 5,567 fugitivity notices published in Georgia and Maryland (and smaller samples from South Carolina and Virginia) were collected and over 9,000 records extrapolated from them, generating new and original information for 2,350 enslaved women, men, and children advertised as escapees by some 2,000 men and women who enslaved them.

My forthcoming manuscript, In Pursuit of Freedom: Fugitive Slaves and Advertised Escape in the Early Republic (publication with the University of Georgia Press: early 2025) centres around the experiences of the enslaved women and men captured in fugitive slave advertisements, emerging as a major contribution to historiographical understandings of slavery in the United States from the turn of the nineteenth century.

Directing attention to a time (the early republic) and to places (Georgia and Maryland) that have not received sustained consideration by scholars of enslaved fugitivity, my book enriches scholarly understanding of the methods adopted by enslavers when enslaved men and women escaped, providing new insights into the attitude of enslavers as well as the role of printers and print in the surveillance of Black bodies.  In Pursuit of Freedom furnishes scholarship with first empirically-based profile of fugitives and fugitivity in Georgia and Maryland at the turn of the nineteenth century. It deploys quantitative and qualitative methods to unearth the stories that enslaved women and men did not write themselves but that can be recovered, reconstructed, and reimagined through careful attention to a vast archive of fugitive slave advertisements that became a standard feature of American newspapers during the eighteenth century.

My new book encourages slavery scholars to interpret fugitive slave advertisements in new and original ways. Pioneering innovative digital humanities methodologies to conceptualize and theorize bondpersons pursuit of freedom as a lifelong struggle, it sheds light on a profoundly personal process of becoming and self-actualization in the lives of enslaved women and men as they distanced themselves physically and psychologically from bondage. Fugitivity, the book argues, marked an important, if uncertain stride, in what has been until now a fugitive process—Not the end but rather a moment in the lives of freedom seekers alluded to in fugitive slave advertisements. Interpreting notices for escapees for what they were truly were—the desperate actions of enslavers to interfere and meddle in a process they could never control—we can ensure that the agency, decision-making, and personhood of the women and men in pursuit of freedom is never again generalized, masked, silenced, or undermined.

 

It’s Time to Think About Ability as well as Disability

Image

Reply

To properly understand what ability means we need to look beyond the human, too.

In this blog post, Dr Andy Flack reflects on his recent open access article in History and Theory – co-authored with fellow Bristol lecturer Dr Alice Would – exploring the history of ability ‘through an animal lens.’

How did you get into thinking about this area?

This article emerged out of my recent AHRC Leadership Fellowship, which brought together environmental history, disability studies and sensory studies for the first time. We looked at animals that live in the dark, and the naturalists (mainly British and north American) that looked for them, and asked how supposedly ‘strange’ and ‘abnormal’ senses were understood between around 1800 and the present day. During our research, this began to raise the question of what naturalists meant when they thought animals were either well-equipped or not to live in their dark worlds. And more than that, we noticed that naturalists and environmentalists had lots to say about environmental change and its impact on the way animals were able to continue living in their worlds. In effect, it seemed that animals were being ‘disabled’ by human changes. As we thought more about this, we realised that to understand that character of this ‘disability’, we had to better understand what people in the past thought it meant to be ‘able’ in the world.

Tell me more about ability beyond the human context?

By looking at a range of dark-dwellers, from bats and hedgehogs to star-nosed moles and deep sea fish and cave-dwellers, we found that the historical idea of ‘ability’ changed over time. Mirroring a medical understanding of the human body, for much of the period naturalists identified ability in the sensory structures of animal bodies, such as the tactile nose of the star-nosed mole, the neurology of the barn owl and the echolocating organs of the bat. Across the period, there emerged an understanding that ability resided in the ways in which specialized bodies interacted with the wider environment, and that environment change could – sometimes fatally – disrupt that ‘harmony’. Early in the twentieth century, it was sometimes seen as the fault of the animal itself in its failure to adapt to modernity. Later, however, there was a sense that for an animal to remain ‘able’, it was the responsibility of people to adapt the environments that we have made so that species can live well together. This has profound implications, because ability today is less often understood as something that resides within some kind of ‘specialised’ body, and more as something that is produced when environments are effectively adapted to the diverse needs of all.

What’s next?

We hope that our article will inspire historians to return to many of the ‘big ideas’ that structure how we think – and have thought – about the world but which often go ‘under the radar of our perception’. We also hope that historians look for the roots of ‘ability’ beyond our context, to test and nuance our findings. Looking well beyond human contexts could offer exciting and urgent ways to do this because we live in a world that is changing fast, and where the adaptation of all beings is going to be imperative. Indeed, we hope that we have shown that to understand either ability or disability, we need to understand both.

Summer Reading: Kate Skinner on Women Talking

Posted on by
Reply

In this blog post, Professor Kate Skinner reflects on a book she read this summer – Women Talking – and draws connections to her current research in gender and legal history. 

Content warning: This post contains descriptions of rape and sexual and gender-based violence.

TLDR 1: The law matters in dealing with sexual and gender-based violence.

TLDR 2: If you don’t want to read the book, you can watch the film instead.

Early this summer, I read Women Talking by Miriam Toews (Faber & Faber, 2018). The story revolves around an imaginary debate between women in a Mennonite settlement in the aftermath of a shocking discovery: a group of eight men within their small, agricultural, religious community had repeatedly sprayed powerful animal tranquiliser over women and girls as they slept and raped them in their ensuing stupor.

Over a period of four years, the women and girls in the story had awoken with painful injuries and fragments of disturbing dreams. They were repeatedly told by the community’s male elders that this was the work of demons upon their wild female imaginations, until one woman stayed awake long enough to catch a perpetrator climbing through her window in the dead of night, animal tranquiliser in hand. The police had been called, and the rapists taken into custody. The women then learn that the elders are selling off assets to raise bail money so they can bring the men home and effect a ‘reconciliation’ with their victims. The women must decide what to do.

The story is narrated by August Epp, a schoolteacher. Born into the same community, to parents who were ex-communicated and left, Epp had attempted to live abroad for a while. He had been uneasily reaccepted after these unsuccessful acts of rebellion, for the community emphasised that Mennonites should marry other Mennonites, remain in their communities, and limit their contact with the rest of the world. When such contact had to be made, it was mediated by male elders. Herein lay a crucial element of their power.

Epp’s school was for boys only. Most of the women in the story could not write, but they wanted their reasoning and their decisions to be recorded, so they asked Epp to join them at their meetings in a hayloft. There, he writes down the arguments that the women made in relation to three options: ‘Do Nothing’, ‘Stay and Fight’, and ‘Leave’. The arguments, often religious and articulated through agricultural metaphors, are interwoven with glimpses of individual characters, whose experiences shape their perspectives upon Mennonite values, and how those values might be interpreted or adapted to respond to this desperate situation.

The reader thus encounters Salome, who had attacked one of the perpetrators with a scythe upon realising what they had done. It was this action that led the male elders to call the police to the community: the perpetrators were deemed in need of protection from the women’s rage. We also meet Miep, Salome’s three-year-old daughter, who needs medical treatment for infection and injuries sustained through rape. We meet Nettie, who refuses to speak to adults but takes care of children, and Greta, whose teeth were knocked out by her night-time attacker when she momentarily regained consciousness and tried to scream. The women in the story write a manifesto to guide their future lives and depart from the settlement.

The dialogue in Women Talking was imagined, but it was crafted in response to events that were real. They occurred between 2005 and 2009 in Manitoba Colony, a Mennonite settlement in Bolivia. The perpetrators were ultimately convicted and sentenced to prison terms.

Later in the summer of 2024, I was reminded of this story upon seeing a BBC headline: ‘Woman describes horror of learning husband drugged her so others could rape her.’ In this case, a French woman, Gisèle, was repeatedly drugged by her husband, Dominique Pélicot, over approximately a decade. He invited dozens of men into her home whilst she slept and photographed and filmed them as they raped her.

The use of tranquiliser to facilitate repeated rape was a common feature of the two stories, as was the violation of a woman’s privacy, dignity, and bodily autonomy by the perpetrators of this grotesque violence. There were of course many differences. One of them was in how perpetrators were caught.

In the more recent French case, Dominique Pélicot was reported by a stranger for ‘upskirting’ (taking photos up women’s skirts without their consent). This is a criminal offence in France. Once he had been reported, he became the subject of a police investigation. The police thereby gained access to his computer equipment, and images and videos of multiple rapes were discovered.

The law alone cannot prevent many forms of sexual and gender-based violence. The law is a limited tool with which to address the structural causes of this violence. Laws may be robustly or poorly written, and effectively or inadequately applied by police, prosecutors, and judges who are trained, committed, and resourced to varying degrees.

But the law definitely matters. Laws that criminalise actions such as ‘upskirting’ – and indeed the production and circulation of ‘deepfakes’ – are laws that criminalise the violation of privacy, dignity, and bodily autonomy. Without them, the police have fewer tools with which to investigate the online worlds in which perpetrators of sexual violence increasingly operate.

Kate Skinner is currently researching in the field of gender and legal history.

Women Talking has since been made into a film.

Internship on British South Asian history: Nazma Ali

Posted on by
Reply

In this special blog post, we hear from Bristol student Nazma Ali on her recent Widening Participation Internship. This internship focussed on the histories of British South Asians from the 1830s to the present, working with Professor Sumita Mukherjee and Dr Aleena Din as part of the Remaking Britain project.

Hi Nazma! Can you tell us a bit more about the internship?

During my recent internship, I contributed to the development of a digital resource titled ‘Remaking Britain: South Asian Connections and Networks, 1830s to the Present.’ Throughout this six-week internship, I worked alongside Professor Sumita Mukerjee and Dr Aleena Din from the University of Bristol’s Department of History. This resource serves both academic researchers and general audiences interested in the experiences and contributions of British South Asians. This group has been less focused on by researchers and I was excited to see a whole internship project based on just South Asian history!

During this project, I had the opportunity of working in the British Library Archives and the Feminist Archive South collection, based in the university’s special collections. I handled diverse materials ranging from nineteenth century manuscripts to pamphlets on youth resistance movements of the 1970s. What I particularly enjoyed was writing entries. I synthesized large amounts of primary and secondary research to produce short essays for the website. I explored the self-organization of South Asians against the National Front and specialized in the resistance of Bangladeshi communities against fascist intimidation in London’s East End.

I would say the work of Bangladeshi women in this movement interested me the most. Anowara Jahan was a committee member of the Commission for Racial Equality, a board member of East London’s Bengali Teachers and worked extremely hard to mobilize Bengali women in local communities. She defied patriarchy control which restricted women to the domestic sphere whilst defying Britain’s racist laws that repressed Asian women. I believe highlighting the works of such individuals is central to the study of history. As someone of Bangladeshi heritage, bringing light to the contributions of my community was my motivation.

I have used resources similar to ‘Remaking Britain’ during my history degree, so it was interesting to see how such websites are produced. I also had the independence to decide what topics I wanted to focus on which was refreshing. I am grateful that this internship provided insight into academic research. I better understood the several opportunities that come with being a researcher. I think this internship project would be an amazing experience for anyone interested in race and gender history.

Finally, I built meaningful relationships with my supervisors. They continuously helped me with my entries. They organized weekly meetings so I could stay up to date and they allowed me to explore my interest in the history of British Bangladeshis. I thoroughly enjoyed this internship, and I am excited to see what impact this resource has!

What drew you to this topic?

Whilst I’ve learnt a lot in my first year of doing History, I noticed that my area of interest was not as well represented in the curriculum. South Asian women’s rights and resistance are my two main interests which I was excited to know this project covered.

About the Author

Nazma Ali has just finished her first year as a Bristol History student, and completed this internship over the summer. Through working on this project, she hopes to bring more light to the resilience of British South Asians.

A Picture on a Wall

Posted on by
Reply

For LGBTQ+ History Month, Professor Ronald Hutton reflects on the life and legacy of Dr John Leslie (1947-1994), a former colleague and historian at the University of Bristol. 

Against one of the walls of my university office sits an oil painting. It is in the German Expressionist style and shows a man in his early thirties, with short, light brown hair and clean-cut features, conventionally dressed in a brown tweed jacket, matching tie and white collared shirt. This is Dr John Leslie, who was a member of the History Department when I arrived in it at the opening of the 1980s. He was an expert on the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and taught the history of modern central and eastern Europe. He was also one of the members of the department at that time – amounting to four out of fourteen – who were gay. All were men in their thirties and forties, with bachelor lifestyles, who contributed much to the convivial atmosphere of the department at the time, marked by constant reciprocal wining and dining. None of them ever referred to their sexual orientation and nobody in the department ever mentioned it or asked them about it. It was instead inferred from acquaintance with them and/or confirmed by less discreet members of Bristol’s gay community. There seemed to be an unspoken agreement in the department that silence on the matter made life easy for everybody: that it was something that could be completely accepted as long as there was no evidence that there was anything to accept. It was rumoured that at one point somebody had been injudicious enough to ask our head of department, an old dear who had fought in Burma in World War Two, what he thought of having so many reputed homosexuals in his department. He was said to have replied that once a person has served east of Suez, these things lose their capacity to shock, and that this was all he would say on the matter. I had a feeling that things had been this way in the university for decades, and perhaps in polite and professional British society for much longer.

John however had an additional reason for keeping his closet door firmly closed against the world. His parents and wider family were devout evangelical Christians, and he retained a vague, residual and guilty attachment to that faith: his friends teased him with having been a church mouse. That family, to which he remained affectionately attached, would have been horrified to learn of his sexual alignment, and this need for secrecy kept him aloof from even the local gay community. Instead he enjoyed holiday adventures abroad: another wholly traditional British way of dealing with the issue. In the mid-1980s he was diagnosed as HIV positive. In this predicament, he could confide in nobody around him, and plunged into a prolonged depression. His baffled friends rallied round: I took him to films and on picnics in an effort to bolster him. After a time he did stablise,and appeared to return to his usual bouncy self. Perhaps he had realised that he still felt fit, and had a small chance of survival, and probably some years still ahead of him. He remained more withdrawn than before, but then the close and familial social life of the department had in any case dissolved in the harsher instititional environment of the 1980s. I myself married, and submerged in the pleasures, and then problems, of domesticity and parenthood. By imperceptible stages, John and I grew amicably apart.

In the early 1990s he suddenly developed AIDS. He resigned precipitately from the university, claiming that he could not bear the changes in British higher education: even now he would not admit the truth. He completely disappeared from our view, having retired into a Bristol hospice, alone and unvisited, where he died a short time later. He spent much of his declining time there listening to classical music, which he loved, on headphones. It was at his funeral, in a local church, that his real story came out, mostly through the hospice chaplain who had tended him during his final weeks. His family wanted nothing to do with his personal possessions, and the university cleared his office. It offered his portrait, painted in Vienna and of which he had once been so proud, to anybody who would take it. John had abandoned it with the other trappings of the office, perhaps because it reminded him of a different time, when long life and academic success still seemed to beckon. Nobody else was interested, and so I volunteered to take it, in memory of my lost friend. I have kept it in my own office ever since, which has been more than thirty years. When people who notice it ask after the identity of the person in it, I tell them John’s story, so that he can be remembered and honoured; and I tell it now, because Richard Stone walked into my office, asked the question, and on hearing the answer persuaded me to mark LGBTQ+ history month by sharing it more widely in the department. Perhaps in the process it is also possible to reflect on the mercifully changing nature of British society and culture, and be grateful for the passing of a traditional world that we may have lost forever.

If you would like to see the painting of John, Professor Hutton invites you to visit his office, 1.44, 13 Woodland Road. 

PhDone! Dr Alice Kinghorn

Posted on by
Reply

Dr Alice Kinghorn completed their undergrad degree at the University of York, followed by an MA at the University of York, before joining Bristol for their PhD. Alice’s PhD examined Anglican missionary societies’ involvement in transatlantic slavery in the early nineteenth century, focusing specifically on Christian support networks behind these societies. Alice, who already has several articles published, successfully defended their PhD in December 2023. To keep up with their latest research, follow @KinghornAlice.

What was your doctoral research about?

My thesis examines the Church of England’s role in transatlantic slavery through the work of Anglican missionaries. I looked at two Anglican missionary societies: the Church Missionary Society (the CMS) and the Incorporated Society for the Conversion and Religious Instruction and Education of the Negro Slaves in the British West India Islands (The Conversion Society). Firstly, I looked at the financial support of both societies by cross-referencing donors and subscribers with UCL’s Legacies of British Slavery Database. This demonstrated the extent to which the West India Interest supported both societies. Secondly, I assessed how Anglican missionaries worked in the Caribbean, including schooling systems. The motivations of the missionary societies and their funders revealed important aspects of both the Church of England’s attitudes towards colonial slavery, determining that Anglican missionaries ultimately worked to delay emancipation. Additionally, I looked at interactions between missionaries and enslaved people which revealed new ideas about enslaved people’s religious experiences in the British Caribbean. I argued that while Anglican missionaries were integral to plans to delay emancipation, enslaved people’s decisions shaped the extent to which their objectives were achieved.  

What was the most exciting, or perhaps challenging, element of your research?

I started my PhD in September 2020, and so archive access was really difficult in my first year. The main archive for my research (Lambeth Palace Library) was closed until October 2021. However, this actually ended up shaping my research as I was limited to the sources I could find online. These were mostly annual reports for missionary societies, and so I developed the idea to research the societies’ financial support during this time. When the archives opened again, I was able to complete the qualitative research for my thesis (mostly through missionary correspondence).

The most exciting element of my research has been the travel opportunities during my time at Bristol. I undertook research at the Archives of Antigua and Barbuda, and presented at conferences in France and Chicago. Whilst I was unable to travel to archives at all in my first year, I certainly made up for it later on. 

Do you have any tips for someone preparing for their viva?

I was nervous for my viva – not because I didn’t think I knew my thesis, but because I didn’t really know what to expect. My supervisors were incredibly helpful by explaining what the format of the viva would look like, and by giving me some questions to think about beforehand. They also reiterated that the viva is an enjoyable experience as your examiners have taken the time to closely read and evaluate your work.

I would say think about why you undertook your research in the first place, its originality, its significance within your field more widely, and any future plans you have for publication/research. I also looked at scholarship that had been published since I submitted, and came prepared to discuss parts of my research that I might have done differently on reflection. I ended up really enjoying my viva! 

What do you have planned next? Are there ways to follow what you do?

I have a few projects lined up that continue research into the Church of England and transatlantic slavery, both in research and public engagement. I am hoping to turn my PhD into a monograph and to publish two more articles this year, with the view of applying for postdocs in the next academic year. 

What would you say to someone who’s considering pursuing a PhD?

If you do decide to pursue a PhD, try to get as involved in as many research groups/research opportunities as you can (if you feel like you have the time/capacity). I built up support networks this way, both in terms of research and friendship, that were invaluable to my research experience. My research profile wasn’t confined to my thesis, and I gained experience in public engagement, publishing, and working with stakeholders.